My EdTech team is shipping too slowly and I am pushing back customer commitments. Is outsourcing the right fix?

It depends on why you are slow. If the roadmap is clear and you simply do not have enough engineers, adding capacity works, and that is the most common EdTech case. If the roadmap keeps changing or nobody owns the architecture, more people will make it worse, and a full outsourcing handoff will make it worse still because you lose the context you need to fix it. The middle option is team extension: engineers who join your standups, your repo and your sprint board while your engineering manager keeps directing the work. You add capacity without giving up control. Our shortlist takes 3 days, and every placement starts with a 2-week trial.

What should I look for when choosing an EdTech development vendor?

Five things. First, verifiable third-party reviews on Clutch or G2, not just testimonials on their own site. Second, named EdTech engagements you can read rather than a generic client list. Third, real standards experience: ask whether their engineers have shipped an LTI 1.3 tool, handled OneRoster rostering, or produced a VPAT, because those answers cannot be faked. Fourth, timezone overlap, since EdTech releases cluster around the academic calendar and async-only cycles cost you weeks. Fifth, exit terms: month-to-month with 30 days notice means they have to keep earning the work.

Do your engineers have real LTI 1.3 and OneRoster experience?

Yes, and we test for it. Our EdTech vetting covers LTI 1.3 with LTI Advantage services, OneRoster 1.2 rostering, QTI 3.0, SCORM 1.2 and 2004, cmi5, xAPI, and Clever and ClassLink SSO integration. These are niche skills but not rare in our network, because EdTech is the largest part of our portfolio. If you need something we genuinely do not have depth in, we tell you rather than sending someone to learn it on your budget.

How do you handle FERPA, COPPA and student data privacy?

Engineers placed on EdTech products are briefed on FERPA education record handling, COPPA verifiable parental consent, GDPR where EU learners are involved, and the state laws that increasingly apply, including California's SOPIPA. In practice that means they know which fields cannot be logged, how retention and deletion have to work, and what audit logging a SOC 2 Type II review will ask for. EnzRossi signs NDAs and data processing agreements, and engineers work inside your infrastructure and access controls, never a parallel environment.

Can your engineers get us to WCAG 2.2 AA and a usable VPAT?

Yes. Accessibility work is a normal part of EdTech engagements for us because districts and universities gate procurement on it. That covers WCAG 2.2 AA remediation, keyboard navigation and focus management, screen reader semantics, accessible assessment components, and the audit trail behind a VPAT. Section 508 and ADA Title II obligations apply to public institutions, so this is usually a sales blocker rather than a technical preference.

Can you scale a team up before a school year and back down after?

Yes, and this is the main reason EdTech companies use us. Engagements are month-to-month after the 2-week trial, with 30 days notice and no exit fees. One client went from 3 developers to more than 30 people across 10+ squads over 24 months and adjusted squad size as initiatives started and finished. You are not carrying full-time salaries through a quiet quarter to have capacity in August.

What about offline-capable mobile learning apps?

React Native with offline sync is a real capability in our talent pool. We have placed engineers who built offline-first apps with background sync and conflict resolution, which matters for learners on unreliable connections and for classroom devices that lose network mid-lesson.

Do you have experience with adaptive learning algorithms?

We have engineers with recommendation system and knowledge tracing experience. For deep Item Response Theory or Bayesian Knowledge Tracing implementations we are upfront about the specific expertise required, because that is a specialized research-adjacent subfield and pretending otherwise wastes your time.

EdTech

Scale the EdTech team you already have.

Most EdTech companies do not have an idea problem. They have a capacity problem: a roadmap the current team cannot ship before the next school year. We add engineers who already know LTI 1.3, OneRoster, SCORM, xAPI and what FERPA lets you log, so they contribute in week one instead of week six.

Build Your Team How It Works

Where edtech engineering gets complicated

EdTech has unique engineering constraints.

The academic calendar is a hard deadline

Miss a September launch and you wait a year, not a quarter. That is why EdTech capacity problems compound: a two-month slip in March is a twelve-month slip in reality, and it is the reason teams end up pushing back customer commitments rather than shipping late.

Interoperability standards are unforgiving

LTI 1.3 with LTI Advantage (Deep Linking, Names and Role Provisioning, Assignment and Grade Services), OneRoster 1.2 for rostering, QTI 3.0 for assessment portability, plus Clever and ClassLink for district SSO. Each has a certification process and a spec that punishes guessing. An engineer who has shipped an LTI 1.3 tool before saves you a month.

COPPA, FERPA, GDPR and state privacy laws all apply at once

K-12 products in the US need verifiable parental consent under COPPA, FERPA-compliant handling of education records, and increasingly a signed Student Data Privacy Consortium (SDPC) agreement per district. California's SOPIPA and dozens of state analogues add more. Engineers who have not worked in education routinely log data they are not allowed to retain.

Accessibility is a procurement gate, not a nice-to-have

Districts and universities ask for a VPAT based on WCAG 2.2 AA before they will sign, and public institutions are bound by Section 508 and ADA Title II. Retrofitting keyboard navigation, focus management and screen reader semantics after launch costs several times what building it in does.

Enterprise buyers audit your security posture

Once you sell to districts or universities, SOC 2 Type II shows up in every RFP, along with penetration test reports, subprocessor lists and incident response commitments. Engineering has to produce the evidence: audit logging, access controls, encryption at rest, and data retention that matches what you promised.

Concurrent load is predictable and brutal

Class start times, exam windows and assignment deadlines all spike at once, and video is usually the largest cost and the highest risk. Encoding pipelines, adaptive bitrate streaming, CDN strategy and offline access all need real engineering rather than a default configuration.

What we build

Specific capabilities for edtech teams.

8 use cases

LTI 1.3, OneRoster and QTI integrations

LTI 1.3 tool and platform implementations with LTI Advantage services, OneRoster 1.2 rostering against district SIS data, QTI 3.0 assessment import and export, and Clever or ClassLink SSO. Engineers who have been through IMS Global certification before, not reading the spec for the first time.

LMS development and customization

Custom LMS platforms, Moodle customization, Canvas and Blackboard integrations, and SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004 and cmi5 compliant content players. Engineers who understand IMS standards.

Accessibility and VPAT readiness

WCAG 2.2 AA remediation, keyboard and screen reader support, accessible assessment components, and the audit work behind a VPAT that survives a district procurement review. Section 508 and ADA Title II obligations included.

Student data privacy engineering

COPPA consent flows, FERPA-aligned data retention and deletion, audit logging, role-based access control, and the SOC 2 Type II evidence trail enterprise buyers ask for. Built so the compliance answer is a query, not a scramble.

Adaptive learning systems

Knowledge tracing, spaced repetition, and personalized learning path systems: built on IRT models or custom recommendation logic.

Video delivery infrastructure

Transcoding pipelines, HLS/DASH streaming, DRM integration, and offline download systems. Engineers who've worked with Mux, Cloudflare Stream, or AWS MediaConvert.

Learning analytics and reporting

xAPI-based event tracking, learning record stores, and dashboards for instructors, students, and administrators. Built to answer real pedagogical questions.

Assessment and proctoring tools

Question banks, randomized assessments, rubric-based grading, and anti-cheating tooling for high-stakes assessments.

AI in this industry

AI tutoring systems, automated essay scoring, and intelligent content recommendation are moving from research prototypes to production features in edtech. Engineers working in this space need to understand not just the models but the pedagogical evidence base: what actually improves learning outcomes versus what just looks impressive in a demo.

Common tech stack

What edtech engineering teams typically use.

LTI 1.3

LTI Advantage

OneRoster 1.2

QTI 3.0

SCORM 2004

cmi5

xAPI

Clever

ClassLink

FERPA

COPPA

GDPR

SOC 2 Type II

WCAG 2.2 AA

VPAT

Section 508

React

Next.js

React Native

TypeScript

Three.js

Node.js

Python

Java

PostgreSQL

Redis

Mux

Agora SDK

FFmpeg

Snowflake

dbt

Airflow

Elasticsearch

AWS

Cloudflare

Segment

Proof

Four EdTech engagements we have already shipped.

EdTech is the largest part of our portfolio. These are real engagements, described with the client's permission where they are named.

An enterprise EdTech company

Scaling from 3 developers to 10+ squads in 24 months

The team could not hire fast enough to cover its roadmap. We started with 3 developers and grew to more than 30 people across 10+ squads covering development, QA, design and product, without the client running a single recruitment cycle.

30+ people, 10+ squads

ReactReact NativePHPNode.jsTypeScript

Read the case study

A large EdTech company

Replacing Zoom with a purpose-built live teaching platform

Live classes ran on Zoom, so the company had no engagement data and no control over the classroom experience. Four engineers embedded in the client's product team built a custom platform on Agora video and Firebase real-time sync, with interactive exercises and engagement tracking, in 6 months.

+40% student engagement

React NativeJavaAgora SDKFirebase RealtimeAWS

Read the case study

Thrive School Guide

Mapping 130K+ US schools for a parent-facing discovery platform

A nationwide school discovery product needed to launch with location search, filters, side-by-side comparison, favorites and parent reviews across all 50 states. One full-stack engineer, one QA engineer and one project manager delivered it.

130K+ schools mapped

Next.jsTypeScriptNode.jsPostgreSQLMapbox

Read the case study

An enterprise education company

Shipping a preschool learning platform in 8 weeks

A new initiative needed three products at once: 3D animated learning worlds with Duolingo-style progression, a parent panel and an admin dashboard. AI-assisted development compressed the build into two months.

3 products in 8 weeks

ReactNext.jsTypeScriptSupabaseThree.js

Read the case study

FAQ

Common questions

Tell us what your roadmap needs. We will send profiles in 3 days.

Engineers who already know the standards, the compliance rules and the academic calendar. Two-week trial, month-to-month after that.

Start the Conversation

3 daysto first shortlist

Scale the EdTech team you already have.